ABSTRACT
This book results from interviews conducted with higher education leaders in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the US, and the UK. It gives the reader a deep and personal insight into what leaders faced in transforming their universities through the financial shocks, changes in learning practice, and returns to new ways of working accelerated by the upheaval of the COVID-19 pandemic. The features of the book are a series of reflections about issues faced by leaders, recorded, analysed, and reflected on at the time they happened. These are combined in an overall theoretical framework, also informed by other scholarly work in the field, to allow the reader to understand what has happened to our universities and what they will and must do next. For leaders, staff, students, and employers, the book will give an in-depth context, analysed into a simple agenda, to frame future expectations of the changing world of higher education and its implications for leadership in this and other sectors. © 2023 Martin Betts. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: The two FDA approved mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines have shown >90% efficacy at preventing COVID and eliciting protective immunity in nearly all healthy individuals. However, the extent of vaccine induced antibody and T cell immunity in immunocompromised patients is not well known. Our study objective is to determine if patients with hematologic malignancies treated with B-cell targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies can mount antibody and T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines. A prospective single-center study to evaluate the SARS-CoV2 immune responses in immunocompromised individuals (COVAX Study) was initiated at University of Pennsylvania following the IRB guidelines. The study enrolled 8 healthy adults,12 patients are in remission after treatment (average of 40.6 months) with CART cells targeting either CD19 or CD19+CD22 and received both doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Methods and Results: Serology to SARS-CoV2 spike-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, RBD-IgA, RBD-IgM and spike-specific T cell responses were measured prior to vaccination and serially up to 28 days after booster vaccination. RBD-IgG and RBD-IgA were detected in 8/8 and 7/8 healthy subjects compared to 5/12 and 2/12 CART patients, respectively (Figure A). In the CART cohort, several patients who demonstrated an induction of RBD-IgG (57.2/uL +/- 20.2) compared to those who were RBD-IgG-negative (9/uL +/- 10.1, ANOVA with multiple comparisons test p=0.017) have higher level of circulating B cells. No association was found with time since CART infusion, age, disease type, or vaccine manufacturer. All 8 healthy subjects demonstrated induction of SARS-Cov2 spike-specific CD4 + T cell immunity compared to 7 out of 11 CART patients (Figure B). RBD-IgG responses were not correlated with CD4 + T cell activation (Pearson correlation, R=0.21, p=0.53). Indeed, 3 CART patients demonstrated robust CD4 + T cell activation despite absence of antibody induction. Overall, 8/12 CART patients demonstrated induction of either or both humoral and T cell immune responses. Conclusions: We show that immune responses to SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccines are induced in majority of patients who have been treated with CART therapies targeting B-cell lineage antigens. Induction of vaccine-specific antibody was strongly associated with the level of circulating B cells. However, in CART cohort patients despite severe humoral immune deficiency, strong CD4 + T cell responses were observed suggestive of a sufficient protective immunity. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Frey: Novartis: Research Funding;Sana Biotechnology: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy;Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Garfall: Amgen: Honoraria;CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Tmunity: Research Funding. Porter: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: Honoraria;Genentech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months;ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;DeCart: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Tmunity: Patents & Royalties;Wiley and Sons Publishing: Honoraria. June: AC Immune, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Consultancy;Tmunity, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Novartis: Patents & Royalties.
ABSTRACT
Rationale: To utilize high-dimensional proteomic data to identify dysregulated pathways that are associated with COVID-19 disease severity and suggest potential therapeutic targets. Methods: We enrolled 161 COVID-19 inpatients admitted at two tertiary care hospitals. Plasma samples collected within 48 hours of admission were analyzed with the Olink Proximity Extension Assay;713 unique proteins were assayed. The WHO COVID-19 ordinal severity scale at enrollment was dichotomized into moderate (levels 3-4) and severe (levels 5-7). Normalized protein expression (NPX) values were generated in relation to a common pooled control plasma on each plate. The association between NPX values and disease severity on admission was estimated with logistic regression (LR) after adjustment for age, sex, race, and select comorbidities. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was employed after application of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure with a false discovery rate of 5% to all proteins for which the NPX difference was +/-0.8 between groups. Predictive models of disease severity on hospital day 7 using all proteins as potential features were fit using elastic net LR (ENLR) and gradient boosting (GBM). Performance was estimated on a held-out test set (40% of the data) with area under the receiveroperator characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Of 161 subjects, 85 (53%) were classified as having severe COVID-19. A total of 552 proteins were differentially expressed (Figure 1), and 31 of these proteins met criteria for inclusion in pathway analysis. IPA identified the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1) signaling pathway (4 members, p=3.8E-3), the tumor microenvironment (TME) pathway (5 members, p=4.1E-3), and the interleukin 17 (IL-17) signaling pathway (4 members, p=1.8E-2). Interleukin 1 receptor-like 1, a member of the TREM-1 pathway, was the protein most associated with disease severity (OR=3.18, p=1.82E-08). Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11 (TNFSF11), a member of the IL-17 signaling pathway was the only factor whose enrichment was associated with less severe disease (OR=0.39, p=2.3E-05). ENLR and GBM predicted disease severity on day 7 with AUROC values of 0.908 (0.828, 0.968) and 0.882 (0.788, 0.957), respectively. Conclusion: We identified pathways differentially expressed between patients with severe and nonsevere COVID-19 associated with immune function and angiogenesis. Several agents currently being investigated to treat severe COVID-19 act on these dysregulated pathways, and future investigations could test whether these proteins act as enrichment markers or response indicators. Integrating protein expression with cellular immune phenotype may help explain COVID-19 pathophysiology.